|
The Abstract
|
> By Stephanie DiCapua Getman, Arnold Ventures
|
Editor's note: First, I'd like to say our hearts are with everyone in the path of Hurricane Ian. In our hometown of Houston, we are all too familiar with the devastation such a storm can cause. Here are some ways to help those impacted.
I'd also like to welcome all of our new subscribers from last week's Texas Tribune Festival. For those who weren't able to make it to Austin, you can watch our Co-Founder and Co-Chair Laura Arnold's talk with Texas Tribune CEO Evan Smith. (She even breaks some news about AV's next area of exploration: infrastructure.)
And this week, Communications Manager Torie Ludwin starts us off with some good news:
With war, hurricanes, and political infighting dominating the headlines and fueling our collective doomscroll, we can’t help but think of the immortal words of Stevie Wonder sung by Chaka Khan as our wish for the moment: “Tell Me Something Good.”
This week, we can. We’ve got a bit of news about children doing well, adults who care, and, as perhaps no surprise to regular readers of The Abstract, a social program that is actually proven to work.
Interim results from a randomized controlled trial of 1,300 youth in the mentoring program Big Brothers Big Sisters show that youth in the program were 54% less likely to have been arrested and 41% less likely to have engaged in substance use than their peers in a control group.
The study also found that youth in the program made significant improvements in several other areas, including school engagement, self-control, social skills, grit, self-advocacy, and family functioning, compared to their peers. These findings are particularly impressive as they essentially replicate those from an earlier randomized controlled trial of Big Brothers Big Sisters conducted in the 1990s.
For policy nerds, these stats are a big-time data thrill. Put more eloquently by the evaluation’s lead researcher David DuBois of the Institute for Health Research and Policy at the University of Illinois Chicago, “The results are a noteworthy addition to a persuasive body of evidence that pairing a young person with a caring adult from their community can truly make an important difference in that youth’s life.”
That’s the other kind of math we’re looking at: Behind the statistical analysis of the interim study results is one person plus one person equals positive change (also known as a successful high-touch intervention). We want to get to know that person plus person — we like to see the people the data represents.
While data is, dare we say, “impactful” and can open funding and influence policy, people are what moves us. So we decided to make a video about two people from one of the agencies that participated in the Big Brothers Big Sisters study: a “Big” and a not-so-little “Little.”
Thanks to the study’s interim results, we have the satisfaction of knowing a measured impact of the Big Brothers Big Sisters youth mentoring program. It’s clear, however, as you get to know these two individuals, that the true exchange between them is immeasurable.
World, meet Xavier and Weldon.
— Torie Ludwin, communications manager
Related: We’ve seen significant results from other high-touch interventions in higher education, such as Bottom Line and CUNY ASAP’s college success programs that lead to, in some studies, a doubling of the graduation rate.
Our Evidence-Based Policy team is supporting evaluations of promising high-touch interventions in other policy areas, including:
|
|
|
Can 'Red Flag Laws'
Make Communities Safer?
|
|
|
|
By Michael Friedrich, Arnold Ventures contributor
A new report outlining key research questions on Extreme Risk Protection Orders (ERPOs) will help states make these laws more effective — and keep communities safe from firearm violence.
What’s Happening: Through the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act, the federal government is funding states to test implementation of ERPOs and evaluate their effectiveness. Professor April Zeoli of Michigan State University recently released a report to guide research on ERPOs, and she is leading a six-state study on these laws. We spoke with Zeoli about the firearm violence and the questions raised in her new report.
Why it Matters: The deadly crises of mass shootings, suicides, and intimate partner homicides demand a response that gets firearms out of the hands of people who threaten violence. “ERPOs are a promising intervention,” says Zeoili, “but they’re relatively new tools.” Her report will help researchers determine the effectiveness of ERPOs and guide critical questions about how they’re being implemented — including concerns around community partnership, equity, and due process.
What’s Next: With unprecedented federal support for ERPOs, more states may adopt these laws, and researchers across the country will be analyzing data to find out how they’re working and whether they reduce violence.
Read the story >
|
|
|
|
Replacing 'Check-the-Box'
Police Accountability
|
|
|
|
By Evan Mintz, director of communications
In 2015, a University of Cincinnati campus police officer fatally shot Samuel DuBose, an unarmed Black man, during a traffic stop. Soon after, Dr. Robin Engel, a professor of criminal justice at the university at the time, was tasked with reforming the campus police department. But when it came to identifying proven ways to improve police accountability and oversight in her own backyard, she realized there was little rigorous research to guide the way.
“The cupboard was bare,” Engel said.
What's Happening: The need for more research in the field of policing accountability was a key focus of a conversation between Walter Katz, AV vice president of criminal justice, and Engel, senior vice president of the National Policing Institute, at the National Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement (NACOLE) annual conference in Fort Worth this month.
Why it Matters: The deaths of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, and too many others at the hands of police in 2020 sparked a nationwide call for civil rights and accountable policing. However, many of the go-to policy responses are based on personal experience and anecdotes rather than research.
Too many reform efforts rely on “check-the-box” style policies, Engel said, such as additional trainings that have no track record for actual results.
What's Next: Both Katz and Engel provided the NACOLE audience with practical tips on creating tools for oversight agencies and police departments to help build the body of evidence around police accountability. For example, Engel encouraged the audience to look for local partners at universities or through the National Policing Institute as well as support from philanthropic organizations, which are able to provide responsive funding tailored to more specific research questions.
Read the story >
|
|
|
|
When Hospitals Squeeze Patients
|
|
|
|
By Juliana Keeping, communications manager
Nonprofit hospitals don’t operate much differently than their for-profit counterparts and are a huge part of the problem when it comes to driving up the cost of care, an investigation published this week in The New York Times underscored. (free link)
Why it Matters: More than half of the nation’s 5,000 hospitals are nonprofits. They receive billions in tax breaks to provide community benefits and charge privately insured patients excessively high prices for care. AV-funded research cited in The New York Times piece includes an analysis of nonprofit financial records by Ge Bai, a professor at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, that suggests these hospitals’ efforts to provide charity care are not aligned with their favorable tax treatment.
What’s Next: This is just the latest in a spate of headlines that detail aggressive maneuvers by hospitals to collect payments — from garnishing patient wages in New York to suing patients in North Carolina. In light of these behaviors, it’s more important than ever for policymakers to consider efforts that both protect patients and lower health care costs. The bipartisan No Surprises Act, which went into effect in early 2022, is an important first step in taking on these challenges.
The law seeks to protect consumers from the indefensible practice of surprise medical billing while also reducing health care costs, and has prevented consumers from receiving more than 2 million surprise bills since it went into effect. As it was implemented, the law and accompanying regulations have been attacked in court by powerful lobbies representing doctors and hospitals, with the latest suit challenging the final regulations implementing the law. If successful, the lawsuits could undermine the savings Congress expected when the law was enacted. AV is encouraging the Administration to continue to strongly implement the law in a manner that protects patients and lowers health care costs.
Read the New York Times story >
Related: The New York Times also detailed how a nonprofit hospital chain used its struggling location in a predominantly Black Virginia neighborhood to turn huge profits. The chain was “basically laundering money through this poor hospital to its wealthy outposts.” (free link)
|
|
|
|
|
Criminal Justice
- Fines and fees make up a small share of state and local revenue but can be devastating for low-income residents. Our grantee Tax Policy Center has a new interactive data feature showing what it would take for states to wipe away fines and fees for a year.
- A shocking new report from the U.S. Department of Justice reveals the federal government has little idea how many Americans die behind bars each year and doesn't have a serious plan to collect this legally required information, writes Lars Trautman, national director of Right on Crime, in an op-ed in The Hill.
Related: 4 Takeaways from a Senate Hearing on Uncounted Deaths in America’s Prisons and Jails
- David Safavian, director of the American Conservative Union Foundation's Nolan Center for Justice, wrote an op-ed in The Oklahoman calling on Sooner State politicians to heed a new survey that found that Oklahoma voters support criminal justice reforms to reduce the number of people behind bars in their state.
Related: A Republican-led coalition in Oklahoma spearheaded a successful campaign to shrink the prison population, improve reintegration, and expand diversion courts.
- In the Journal of the American Medical Association, Andrew Morral and Rosanna Smart of RAND Corporation highlight how new support for research will help clarify many of the unanswered questions about firearm violence and prevention.
Related: Morral and Smart had an op-ed in Science Magazine this week about the need for better data collection to help reduce violent crime.
Health Care
- Kaiser Health News' Noam Levey reviews hospital finances in the country's 306 hospital markets and finds several of the most profitable markets also have some of the highest levels of patient debt. “Nationwide, many hospitals have grown wealthy, spending lavishly on advertising, team sponsorships, and even spas, while patients are squeezed by skyrocketing medical prices and rising deductibles,” Levey reports.
Higher Education
- Student debt cancellation news keeps coming. The Congressional Budget Office estimates it will cost approximately $400 billion — possibly more. The White House estimates 42.4 million borrowers will qualify for some relief. And Sen. Tom Cotton introduced a bill to lower the cost of tuition and hold colleges more responsible for loans they encourage students to take.
- In Slate, Kevin Carey of New America proposes the federal government split its one-size-fits-all student loan system into three: one for short-term, job-focused credentials; one for traditional undergraduate degrees; and one for graduate and professional school.
- Douglas Harris of the Brookings Institution outlines the legal, rhetorical, and political impacts of Biden’s debt forgiveness plan.
- In his op-ed in The Hill, Jared Bass of Center for American Progress argues that only Congress can tackle the root causes of high tuition and low-quality institutions and programs. Bass recommends Congress double the Pell grant, have institutions match financial aid funding, and better protect students and taxpayers via the gainful employment rule.
- Who’s accrediting the school accreditors? NACIQI, that’s who, and Third Way recaps the group’s last meeting (that’s the National Advisory Committee on Institutional Quality and Integrity). As school accreditation is directly tied to access to federal student loan dollars, accountability not only matters, it costs (see above on student debt).
- Online program management companies (OPMs) are showing signs of struggle, reports HigherEd Dive, with revenue declines, employee layoffs, and the full dissolution of top OPMs.
Contraceptive Choice and Access
- Health Affairs argues that vague language around the Affordable Care Act’s requirement to provide “recommended preventive services” with no cost-sharing for the insured can undermine contraceptive care and access. Health care attorneys also find them confusing.
- Two studies by Guttmacher Institute find that state policies limit patient access to reproductive health care, according to Patient Engagement HIT.
- Direct Relief outlines the many barriers to contraceptive access as the need increases.
Evidence-Based Policy
- In The Washington Post, former AV Vice President Jon Baron says that until states like Maryland begin implementing social programs with an evidence base, they can expect the same thing: money going into programs that show little change over time. (free link)
Journalism
- AV is proud to support the nonprofit news outlets recently recognized for producing journalism that is driving change. Read their work here. Congratulations to all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Wednesday, Oct. 19, at 1 p.m. PT / 4 p.m. ET, join a webinar on charitable giving reform: "Where Has All the Money Gone? Why Food Banks and other Basic Needs Nonprofits Should Support Philanthropic Policy Change " will explore why more than a trillion dollars in charitable “gifts” are locked up in private foundations and donor-advised funds (DAFs), rather than being used to support our nation’s charities. Speakers include Susannah Morgan of Oregon Food Bank; Ray Madoff of Boston College Law School Forum on Philanthropy and the Public Good; Vu Le of Nonprofit AF; and Chuck Collins of Program on Inequality and the Common Good at the Institute for Policy Studies. Register here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Have an evidence-based week,
– Stephanie
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephanie DiCapua Getman develops and executes Arnold Ventures' digital communications strategy and oversees daily editorial operations and design.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Were you sent this briefing by a friend? Sign up here to get the AV Newsletter.
|
|
You received this message because you signed up for Arnold Ventures' newsletter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|